Senedd Cymru | Welsh Parliament
Bil Senedd Cymru (Rhestrau Ymgeiswyr Etholiadol)| Senedd Cymru (Electoral Candidate Lists) Bill
Ymateb gan Ann Thomas | Evidence from Ann Thomas
I am against this bill as it is currently worded. There was a time when the terms sex and gender could have been used interchangeably but no longer. Gender now describes how any person feels about themselves and as a category is therefore impossible to meaningfully pin down in a legal framework. I would assume the purpose of this bill is to tackle the historic underrepresention of women in our democratic institutions. Therefore, why not use the term sex as its meaning is unambiguous and clearly defined in law.
This is self ID by stealth. Any man can claim to be a woman and you propose this would be uncontested. We therefore could have a Senedd that was 50% men and 50% men who claim they are women. How on earth could this situation further the rights and participation of women in politics. I am completely opposed.
They go against the basic rule of fairness to women. I'm not a legal expert but I hope they contravene UK law. I hope we are protected by the Equality Act.
If you pass this bill you will have shown yourselves to be unfit to represent the needs of 51.1% of the Welsh people and will be out of sync with the world as it thankfully moves away from gender ideology.
I've no idea how much it costs to defend legal challenges but you'll be squandering tax payers money. I think you have more urgent things which need this money - the NHS?
I have no idea
I have no idea but I know it flies in the face of women's rights.
I think I've already set out my concerns. The Welsh government continues to draft legislation without reference to ALL its stakeholders namely women. They have consistently refused to meet with women's organisations on a whole host of matters and label anyone who disagrees with their views as bigots. They are tarnishing the reputation of the Senedd and making people question devolution itself.
Not at this moment
No